Whole Foods' GMO labeling

Whole Foods' mandatory GMO labeling initiative and why it will take five years to solve the GMO problem
(NaturalNews) In the wake of Whole Foods announcing mandatory GMO labeling of all products sold across its stores by 2018, there has been a lot of healthy debate on the subject. Jon Rappoport argues that Whole Foods should ditch all GMO foods and essentially become a "GMO-free" retailer.

Ronnie Cummins of the Organic Consumers Association emailed me and said:

We need to raise the bar and ask coops and natural foods stores to implement comprehensive GMO labeling as soon as possible, with implementation completed no later than July 2015, which is what Washington's I-522 labeling law calls for. Washington voters are very likely to pass the I-522 GMO Labeling ballot initiative on November 5, 2013, with an 18 month implementation period.

The consensus is that Whole Foods should move more quickly on GMO labeling, and nearly everyone agrees that Whole Foods ultimately needs to be a GMO-free retailer if it hopes to uphold its image of selling premium healthy foods.

Practical concerns: Why the natural products industry would struggle to be GMO-free by 2018

In theory, I agree with Rappoport and Cummins, but on a practical level, I know that large corporate machines like Whole Foods are very, very difficult to change quickly. As someone who sources raw materials, manufactures and retails health products for our own store, I also know there are huge challenges in the supply lines of non-GMO materials.

For example, we can't keep our organic, non-GMO freeze-dried organic foods in stock because the demand far outstrips supply. When a giant retailer like Whole Foods asks its 5,000+ suppliers to label the GMO content of their products by 2018, it's essentially asking thousands of food manufacturers to find new sources for their raw materials. In reality, the non-GMO agricultural output needed to meet that demand simply does not exist in 2013.

Although the point has merit, I ultimately disagree with Rappoport's belief that consumers are likely to ignore GMO labels. I think GMO labels will be the single most frequent reason why consumers will check labels, and any product carrying a label that admits to the presence of GMOs will see pictures of its labels splattered all across the internet in a "GMO hall of shame" display. To carry an admission of GMOs on your label is to commit brand suicide. It's the equivalent of saying, "This product is intentionally formulated with poison."

I can promise you that Natural News will be posting all the product names and brands sold at Whole Foods that still contain GMOs by 2018. We will literally call it the "GMO Hall of Shame" and explain, "These companies had five years to eliminate GMOs, and they refused to do so."

GMO labeling is GMO elimination

So Whole Foods' demand that suppliers comply with GMO labeling by 2018 is very nearly a demand that they all become GMO-free by 2018. And while five years seems very far away, from the point of view of farming demand, product reformulation, raw materials changes, labeling changes, compliance and testing, it's actually not unreasonable. Yes, I would like to see GMO labeling in 2015, as called for by the upcoming Washington state law, but I honestly think it will be difficult for food manufacturers to comply by 2015.

But don't worry: We are clearly winning the war against GMOs. As HushLeaks.com recently reported, Monsanto spies were found to be walking the halls of the recent Natural Products Expo West in California. There, claims of "GMO-free" had spread like wildfire across the industry, with product literature practically inundated with anti-GMO language.

This means natural product suppliers are being hammered with questions from their own customers: "Are your products non-GMO?" GMOs are the kiss of death for natural product companies. Any product manufacturer who does not begin making the switch to non-GMO formulations will quite possibly find itself out of business by 2018.

Go non-GMO or go out of business

Thanks to Whole Foods' announcement, the natural products industry now has huge economic incentives to start eliminating GMOs once and for all. That's a good thing, and it's why I say we need to support Whole Foods in their effort to label all GMOs by 2018.

Would we like it to be done sooner? Of course we would. Is it practical to transition the entire industry off GMOs by 2015? Probably not. There simply isn't the supply of non-GMO raw materials in the pipeline.

Also, remember that farmers who have been spraying Monsanto's deadly pesticides on their farms have caused long-term damage to the soil, and it will take 7 - 10 years for those farms to recover. Right there, we're talking about a decade-long transition away from toxic biotech farming methods.

U.S. farms are also battling runaway superweeds caused by biotech herbicides, and that problem may never be solved. In a very real sense, America has gone so far down the GMO abyss that the seemingly simple act of choosing a new course is far more easily said than done.

And then there's the regulatory challenge: As I previously predicted here on Natural News, I fully expect Monsanto and the FDA to team up and try to block Whole Foods from pursuing its announced goal of mandatory GMO labeling by 2018. We, the activists who made all this happen in the first place, may need to rally our troops to support the RIGHT of Whole Foods to demand honest label compliance.

See, this is uncharted territory. To my knowledge, no large food retailer has ever stepped on the toes of the FDA like this. Food labeling is the FDA's territory, but Whole Foods has, with this announcement, effectively become its own FDA in regard to food labels. You can bet the FDA is steaming mad over this usurpation of their regulatory power, and they are going to fight this in ways that we can only begin to imagine.

This is ultimate going to come down to a legal battle between the FDA and Whole Foods, and it's not even clear that Whole Foods will win. That's why we need to keep pushing for state laws against GMOs right now. The Whole Foods labeling effort may be shut down by the FDA with claims that Whole Foods cannot "regulate food labels."

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039456_Whole_Foods_GMOs_food_labels.html#ixzz2NQm5d41M

Cooking with a microwave

Why cooking with a microwave destroys cancer-fighting nutrients in food and promotes nutritional deficiencies

(NaturalNews) Microwaves absolutely decimate the nutritional value of your food, destroying the very vitamins and phytonutrients that prevent disease and support good health. Previous studies have shown that as much as 98% of the cancer-fighting nutrients in broccoli, for example, are destroyed by microwaving.



To understand why, you have to understand the nature of vitamins and phytonutrients (plant-based nutrients). These are very delicate molecules which are fragile. They are easily destroyed by heat, which is why raw plant foods contain more plant nutrients than cooked foods. Carotenoids, antioxidants and other molecules like DIM (in broccoli) or anthocyanins (in purple corn) are all easily destroyed by microwave energy.

Microwaves "nuke" your food at a cellular level

Microwaving is the worst way to cook foods because microwaves excite the water molecules inside whatever you're cooking, causing heat to be formed from the inside out. This results in a cell-by-cell "nuking" of the food (such as broccoli, carrots, etc.), causing the near-total molecular decomposition of the vitamins and phytonutrients that promote disease.

Microwaved food is not merely "dead" food at every level, it is food that has been molecularly deconstructed, leaving nothing but empty calories, fiber and minerals. Virtually the entire vitamin and phytonutrient content has been destroyed.

Anybody who says microwaving food is a healthy way to cook is wildly ignorant of nutrition and cooking methods. While steaming vegetables is, indeed, a good method for some veggies to help make certain nutrients more bioavailable, microwaving destroys veggies from the inside out at a cellular level.

Don't be fooled by appearances

What's really deceptive about microwave cooking is that the food still appears to be basically the same, but at the cellular level, it's like a nuclear war has taken place. The actual molecular structure has been decimated. If you could see microwaved foods with a powerful microscope, you'd never eat them again because you would recognize just what a nutritional wasteland they really are.

If you want to eat in a healthy way, make sure a significant part of your diet is raw plants. It's okay to eat some steamed, stir-fried or even grilled veggies, but when grilling foods, avoid burning them because all burned parts contain toxic, cancer-causing chemicals that promote colon cancer.

Personally, I am absolutely astonished that more people don't already know all this. I'm even having to talk with my own staff about these issues, as they don't seem to know the full story on microwave cooking. Spread the word: Microwaves promote death because they turn nutritious, healthy food into empty, decimated calories. I gave up using a microwave well over a decade ago, and I don't even own one.

Remember, a person who cooks a lot of their food with microwaves will inevitably have chronic nutritional deficiencies that promote cancer, diabetes, bone diseases, loss of brain function, heart disease and many other health problems. The least healthy people of any society are typically the ones who frequently use the microwave oven to "nuke" their foods.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039404_microwave_ovens_vitamins_nutrients.html#ixzz2MylFmAiT